May 13, 2006, 01:47 AM // 01:47
|
#1
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monkeyball Z
Guild: S.K.A.T. [Ban]
Profession: Mo/
|
Why are alliance battles called alliance battles?
I am wondering why they called it alliance battles, because it has absolutely nothing to do with your alliance.
It would have been cool if you could play with 3 teams with 4 from each guild of your alliance, but right now it looks more like random arenas with mending wammo's running around trying to solo stuff..
Are arenanet planning to do something to make alliances useful to pvp players? because right now i don't see any use to an alliance, as we pvp players wont be able to hold a city, and will never be able to things like elite missions, as i am not a faction farmer and noone in my guild is.
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 11:04 PM // 23:04
|
#2
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston
Profession: N/W
|
as near as anyone can figure it is for no logical reason.
|
|
|
May 16, 2006, 10:39 AM // 10:39
|
#3
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monkeyball Z
Guild: S.K.A.T. [Ban]
Profession: Mo/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyril Aspect
as near as anyone can figure it is for no logical reason.
|
offcourse, but i hoped they would put in some new forms of pvp into factions, instead they just added another random arena like pvp style.
i'm hoping to see real alliance battles.
|
|
|
May 16, 2006, 06:31 PM // 18:31
|
#4
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New England
|
ArenaNet is notoriously bad at naming things. I wouldn't hold your breath for any amazing names in the future.
Faction with Balthazar isn't like Faction with Luxons which is like Faction with Kurzicks, and the last two are only useful if you own Guild Wars: Factions.
Yeaaahhhhh.
|
|
|
May 17, 2006, 11:43 AM // 11:43
|
#5
|
Academy Page
|
It's a battle between 3 groups of people that are allied with the Kurzicks and 3 groups of people allied with the Luxons...
2 Alliances doing battle with each other.
|
|
|
May 18, 2006, 01:07 AM // 01:07
|
#6
|
Academy Page
|
should be faction battles.
|
|
|
May 19, 2006, 07:43 PM // 19:43
|
#7
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: Funny Equals Ban
Profession: Mo/Me
|
lets just call them anet's failure at integrating pvp and pve. Sounds catchy to me
|
|
|
May 19, 2006, 08:01 PM // 20:01
|
#8
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado
Profession: N/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deluxe
I am wondering why they called it alliance battles, because it has absolutely nothing to do with your alliance.
It would have been cool if you could play with 3 teams with 4 from each guild of your alliance, but right now it looks more like random arenas with mending wammo's running around trying to solo stuff..
Are arenanet planning to do something to make alliances useful to pvp players? because right now i don't see any use to an alliance, as we pvp players wont be able to hold a city, and will never be able to things like elite missions, as i am not a faction farmer and noone in my guild is.
|
pardon me while I shed the worlds smallest tear for your plight in not being able to hold a city with your PVP guild..
you can continue to emote your rank in heros ascent.. Ill not complain one bit about it
|
|
|
May 19, 2006, 08:11 PM // 20:11
|
#9
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: www.talkingtonoobs.com
Guild: Final Dynasty
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samueldg
pardon me while I shed the worlds smallest tear for your plight in not being able to hold a city with your PVP guild..
you can continue to emote your rank in heros ascent.. Ill not complain one bit about it
|
PvP and PvE should garner the same amount of faction faction (that's luxon/kurzick faction) to give your alliance.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 PM // 23:21.
|